Major differences between the two theories Essay

The obviously nonable difference between Banduras social cognitive possibility and Becks cognitive theory is the bias that apiece has towards behavior. For instance, Banduras model is more behavioral, whereas Becks model is inclined towards psychotherapy or seems to provide psychological solutions to problems. The social cognitive theory (by Bandura) is presented in an agentic perspective. It explains why people exhibit differences in self-organization, being proactive, participation in self-reflection, and in self-regulation (Bandura, 1986).In essence, the theory does not just show that human beings find different capabilities, it in like manner shows that other factors such as the surround dramatic play a major role in shaping behaviorism (Bandura, 1986). The theory further describes human beings as producers as well as products of what they grade (the proverb courtesy maketh man should be true). Banduras theory also gives the socio cognitive aspects of human beings, for exa mple, why they act in particular manners and what elicits such behavior.Additionally, the theory also gives reasons why the human nature is massive in terms of capabilities and how humanity is fashioned by direct and observational experience that is integrated in a variety of forms. In contradistinction, Becks theory gives a picture of the phenomena underlying dysfunctional beliefs (Beck, 1976). This theory does not just describe soulality, provided provides solutions to psychological problems. This is achieved by the models blow-by-blow analysis of the casual agents of depression and how depression can be remedied (Beck, 1976).Becks theory seems to give mediation approach in closure psychological problems by encouraging patients to be participants of the problem solving exercise rather than passive and helpless respondents. Another difference between the deuce theories is the triad used in severally of the theories, which forms the basis of the entire illustrations and discu ssions. Banduras model is a triad with behavior, environmental factors and personal determinants as the of import elements. On the other hand, Becks cognitive model consists of behavior, antecedent events and consequences (Beck, 1976 Beck, 1998).The triads whitethorn seem to portray a similarity between the two models entirely in real sense they exhibit differences since the explanation of how the elements in the triads tint each other or act on their own is just about different. For instance, in Banduras theory, the description of how the factors in the triad affect each other revolves around cause and effect. One of the factors, such as the environment is implied to be a cause (or a factor that determines) of behavior. Thus, there is accent on reciprocal determinism.On the other hand, Becks triadic illustration of the factors that perform personality and character is influenced by the person (self), the gentleman and the future. In this context, it is plain that personalit y is affected not just by behavior but also by other events that occur in life. In fact, Beck (1976) describes the person (self) as the main source of ideas to solve depression problems with reference to the world and anticipation of a better future. Conclusion Banduras cognitive possibility and Becks Cognitive Theory seem to have more similarities in that they describe personality and the factors shape it.Many elements described in each theorys triad show convergence in meaning. major(ip) differences between the two models lie in the description of the models. While Banduras model is inclined towards behaviorism, Becks model provides an explanation of psychological dysfunctions and achievable remedies.References Bandura A. (2006). Psychological modeling Conflicting theories. Chicago Aldine Transaction. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy The exercise of control. overbold York W. H. freewoman Company Bandura, A. (1986).Social foundations of thoughts and action A social cognitive the ory. New tee shirt scholar Hall Professional Technical.Bandura, A. (1976) Social learning theory. New York Prentice Hall Bandura, A. (1971). Psychological modeling Conflicting theories. Chicago Aldine- Atherton. Beck, A. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York Guilford Press Beck, A. (1976). Cognitive therapy & emotional disorders. NY International Universities Press. Beck, A. (1998). The Integrative Power of Cognitive Therapy. New York Guilford Press.