Aung San and Faith Bandler Essay Example for Free

Aung San and Faith Bandler Essay?Today, lack of equality and calmness be prominent issues which shape the world. Such things atomic number 18 butt againstd in Aung San Suu Kyis speech, Keynote denotation at the Beijing World Conference on Women and Faith Bandlers speech, Faith, Hope and Reconciliation by dint of the use of various language devices. The common uses of affective language between the two texts greatly demand the audience as it creates a sense of understanding and unity. For example, ASSK states, The struggle for democracy and human rights in Burma is a struggle for life and dignity. It is a struggle that encompasses our political, social and economic aspirations. the repetitive use of struggle emphasizes the hardships for the heap of Burma and their desire for freedom. It is a struggle for young girls to be driven to sexual slavery where they are put forward to constant humiliation, there is a struggle for freedom, dignity and security. Her use of emotiv e language and repeat enables the audience to sympathise with her and the people of Burma that the causes of these struggles are lack of equality and peace in the world or our global village.Similarly in Faith Bandlers speech, emotive language and repetition are recognised once again to unify the audience and the speaker to create a sense of sympathy which draws upon the theme of inequality and peace. It was a rather slow process for her to understand, when there are millionswho are hungry, millions who are homeless, millions who are without depart, the wrongfully imprisoned, the deaths in custody, the torturedwhy is it so hard to find our commonalities? , Faith stresses the fatuousness of how difficult it is for people to find commonalities with her use of repetition of millions.Its becomes a problem when millions are hungry, homeless and light as it portrays our society as unequal. The rhetorical questions asked throughout her speech such as why is it so hard to find our common alities? and what is rapprochement slightly? state the obvious truths, that it isnt hard to find reconciliation or peace within the world. Faith demonstrates a world of inequality through the use of emotive language and repetition. Suu kyi and Bandlers speeches are effective in connecting to their audience when demonstrating the theme of equality and peace.Both activists demonstrate unity to the audience by using inclusive language and first somebody. For example, as Suu Kyi acknowledges the strong and high-principled women who have lobbied for her release, I cannot let this opportunity pass without speaking of the gratitude we feel towards our sisters everywhere. The use of first person and inclusive language is evident throughout the speech, it illustrates a personal approach to her audience as hearty as clearly portraying her firm views of women. Bandlers speech is overly evident of the use of these devices.By using first person throughout her speech, it indicates her fam iliarity with the audience as she was here once before and also shows that she speaks from a personal experience giving the audience an idea of what she has been through such as her work in campaigning and co founding various companies. In order to move the audience about reconciliation whether its the youth or the not so young, her use of first person and inclusive language connects to the audience. Both ASSK and Bandler bring their audiences together as a whole to look at common issues of the world and better ways to bring peace.